Psychosocial interventions to improve tuberculosis preventive treatment uptake and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review

Open

Ida A. A. Parwitha, Vania D. Djunaidy, Sofa D. Alfian, Hari Setyowibowo, Ivan S. Pradipta

2025 npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine Vol. 35 Issue 1 Review Cited by 3 Quartile

Abstract

Despite its importance in global TB elimination, tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) remains underutilized. Psychosocial barriers significantly contribute to this issue. This systematic review aims primarily to synthesize psychosocial interventions to improve the initiation of TPT. We analyzed psychosocial outcomes as secondary objectives when relevant data were available. This review included studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo until August 25, 2025. Original studies addressing psychosocial interventions for people with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) indicated for TPT were included in this review. The risk of bias was assessed via the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool (CCAT). A narrative synthesis summarized the characteristics of interventions, including the format of delivery, settings, intervention providers, psychosocial content, duration, and outcomes. Among the 1725 identified studies, nine (14,428 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The CCAT classification was moderate to high quality, with strengths in clearly articulated study rationales but weaknesses in study design. Most studies were from upper-middle-income countries with a high burden of TB; none were from Asia. Health education is a core component, often incorporating culturally adapted survivor testimonials to reduce stigma and increase motivation. Interventions were mostly community-based and led by multidisciplinary healthcare professionals and community workers. TPT initiation improved in all included studies, with risk differences ranging from 10–52%. This review emphasizes the potential of psychosocial interventions in supporting behavior change and increasing TPT initiation. Methodological limitations and a lack of research in high-burden Asian contexts restrict the current evidence. Future studies should focus on developing rigorous, contextually appropriate strategies for scalable psychosocial interventions that are effective and sustainable. © The Author(s) 2025.

Affiliations

Doctoral Program of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia; Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Surabaya, Indonesia; Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia; Drug Utilization and Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group, Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia